Jump to content

Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/Today

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

See Wikipedia:Categories for deletion policies for the official rules of this page, and how to do cleanup.

Deletion of a category may mean that the articles and images in it are directly put in its parent category, or that another subdivision of the parent category is made. If they are already members of more suitable categories, it may also mean that they become a member of one category less.

How to use this page

[edit]
  1. Know if the category you are looking at needs deleting (or to be created). If it is a "red link" and has no articles or subcategories, then it is already deleted (more likely, it was never really created in the first place), and does not need to be listed here.
  2. Read and understand Wikipedia:Categorization before using this page. Nominate categories that violate policies here, or are misspelled, mis-capitalized, redundant/need to be merged, not NPOV, small without potential for growth, or are generally bad ideas. (See also Wikipedia:Naming conventions and Wikipedia:Manual of Style.)
  3. Please read the Wikipedia:Categorization of people policy if nominating or voting on a people-related category.
  4. Unless the category to be deleted is non-controversial – vandalism or a duplicate, for example – please do not depopulate the category (remove the tags from articles) before the community has made a decision.
  5. Add {{cfd}} to the category page for deletion. (If you are recommending that the category be renamed, you may also add a note giving the suggested new name.) This will add a message to it, and also put the page you are nominating into Category:Categories for deletion. It's important to do this to help alert people who are watching or browsing the category.
    1. Alternately, use the rename template like this: {{cfr|newname}}
    2. If you are concerned with a stub category, make sure to inform the WikiProject Stub sorting
  6. Add new deletion candidates under the appropriate day near the top of this page.
    1. Alternatively, if the category is a candidate for speedy renaming (see Wikipedia:Category renaming), add it to the speedy category at the bottom.
  7. Make sure you add a colon (:) in the link to the category being listed, like [[:Category:Foo]]. This makes the category link a hard link which can be seen on the page (and avoids putting this page into the category you are nominating).
  8. Sign any listing or vote you make by typing ~~~~ after your text.
  9. Link both categories to delete and categories to merge into. Failure to do this will delay consideration of your suggestion.

Special notes

[edit]

Some categories may be listed in Category:Categories for deletion but accidently not listed here.

Discussion for Today

[edit]
This page is transcluded from Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025_March_29


March 29

[edit]

NEW NOMINATIONS

[edit]

British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies upmerge

[edit]
Nominator's rationale: This is a followup to Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 February 28#British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies, implementing the "full merge" option discussed there. I am leaving out year-related categories to a followup nomination as they might need more complicated handling. -- Beland (talk) 07:37, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Suffragette 1911 census boycotters

[edit]
Convert Category:Suffragette 1911 census boycotters to article 1911 census boycotters
Nominator's rationale: I'm not sure if this can be listified, but I struggle to see how this is a defining category SMasonGarrison 04:39, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I might give it a try if no one else does. NLeeuw (talk) 07:50, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

1900–1999 disease outbreaks

[edit]
Nominator's rationale: Not enough disease outbreaks in the 20th century to diffuse by year. WP:OCYEAR. Many of these outbreaks span multiple years, making decades an even better choice. –Aidan721 (talk) 02:42, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

6th-century famines

[edit]
Nominator's rationale: Not useful for navigation through at least the 15th century. WP:NARROWAidan721 (talk) 02:23, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

14th-century epidemics

[edit]
Nominator's rationale: Not useful for navigation. Redundant category layers. WP:NARROWAidan721 (talk) 02:16, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Sports trophies and medals

[edit]
Nominator's rationale: Clearly the same scope and Category:Sports trophies and awards is already well-developed. Pichpich (talk) 01:38, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category::Category:Visual Studio Code - Open Source distributions

[edit]
Nominator's rationale: Please suggest a better destination than my tentative place-holder. The original contains the always-invalid ⟨ - ⟩. Correcting the hyphen-minus to an en dash still leaves the problem that the name is impossible to use in running text without confusion because the dash appears to function within the surrounding sentence rather than separate elements within the name, and my tentative suggestion of an unspaced en dash, while compatible with the MoS, appears to connect Code and Open rather than separate the phrases that contain them. Stephan Leeds (talk) 01:38, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Thai people by populated place and occupation

[edit]
Nominator's rationale: Redunant category layer SMasonGarrison 00:15, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Omani sportspeople by populated place

[edit]
Nominator's rationale: Duel upmerge for now. Redundant category layer SMasonGarrison 00:12, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]